To advise those trying to commercialize art to "design a shrewd survival structure between short-term profitability and artistry" might, in fact, be a tremendous luxury. Hidden behind this warm advice lies the coldest, most brutal historical fact:
"Who on earth can afford the cost of that time gap until one’s artistry is converted into a viable business?"
To skip straight to the conclusion: in terms of barriers to entry, art—both in the past and in the present—has always been the exclusive property of the strong, the high-income earners who possess economic leeway. The power to stubbornly forge one’s soul and philosophy without obsessing over immediate returns—that is, the presence of capital to endure—is determined by social class to begin with.
The Historical Fact: The Medici Family and the Hobbies of the Joseon Elite
The reason Michelangelo or Leonardo da Vinci, whose names brilliantly adorn Western art history, could carve sculptures and paint pictures to their heart’s content without worrying about hunger is crystal clear. The absolute rulers and capitalists (the strong) of their era, such as the Medici family and the Papacy, fully funded that "cost of enduring."
Our own history is no different. The literary artists of the Joseon Dynasty, who recited poetry and painted with a noble spirit, mostly belonged to the Yangban (the scholar-bureaucrat elite) class, whose survival needs were completely secured. Only the strong, liberated from the heavy chains of immediate livelihood, could afford to discuss a "pure artistry" that transcended money.
Today’s contemporary art and knowledge entrepreneurship markets may look democratized on the surface, but internally, they operate under an even more sophisticated logic of capital. Those backed by a sturdy family fortune, or who already pull in high incomes from other professional sectors, build their unique brands without compromising for short-term returns. On the flip side, those crushed by the immediate anxiety of day-to-day survival fail to endure that time lag; they either sacrifice their artistry to become suppliers of cheap, snackable information, or eventually vanish behind the curtains of the stage. As the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu implied, only those with economic freedom (money) can truly afford to enjoy and flaunt cultural freedom (art).
A Tiny Crack Permitted by the 21st Century: Digital Leverage
Does this mean the weak, who possess no such capital, are forever barred from entering this mesmerizing market of perspective and art? Fortunately, in the 21st century, a "microscopic crack" has emerged—one that never existed in the aristocratic societies or bourgeois eras of the past. It is the "zeroing out of production and distribution costs" brought about by the internet and digital platforms.
In the past, to project your voice into the world, publish a book, or hang a painting in a gallery, you had to be chosen by a massive capitalist. The very process of winning that selection was another towering wall.
Today, however, even the weak with empty pockets can hurl their original perspectives and essays directly at the world via free platforms like Brunch, YouTube, and social media. Granted, the fundamental homework of earning a living while holding out until success arrives still remains. Yet, at the very least, the cost of stepping onto the global stage and pitching your ball has plummeted to exactly zero dollars.
The Most Elegant Class Warfare of the Weak
Art inherently demands "capital capable of absorbing time and failure," making it an undeniable reality that this game is overwhelmingly rigged in favor of the strong.
Yet, the advanced information society of the 21st century no longer defines the strong solely by "inherited wealth passed down by parents." It throws open a narrow but solid door for the "weak with a fierce survival instinct"—those who run a grueling survival-oriented business by day to earn capital, and relentlessly push the art of their soul by night.
Perhaps, in this day and age, an ordinary person overcoming the boundaries of capital to turn their original perspective and art into a successful business is the most elegant, monumental form of class warfare. It is a raw reclamation of the "monopoly on manufacturing the world’s myths," which the strong have exclusive rights to for centuries.
Today, as you quietly hold your pen before a blank monitor, you are carving the most beautiful crack into that monolithic fortress.
Leave a Reply