-
Why Tarot Cannot Enter the “Domain of Science”
Tarot Has No “External Variables”
Four Pillars and astrology share at least one assumption:
that the temporal coordinate of “when one is born” compresses a correlation structure between nature and humans.For that reason, Four Pillars and astrology—however weakly—
still allow room for external-world variables such as environment, seasons, and social conditions to intervene.Tarot has no such axis.
There is no birth moment, no natural cycle, no environmental coordinate.
Tarot possesses almost no objective variables connected to the external world.At this point, tarot diverges from the lineage of Four Pillars and astrology.
The Core of Tarot Is “Randomness”
Tarot always begins with shuffling and drawing.
There is no meaning here—
it is purely a probabilistic event.Yet this randomness serves a crucial function.
It forcibly interrupts habitual streams of thought,
breaking people out of their usual cognitive paths.Tarot is less a device of prophecy
than a trigger for restarting thought.
Symbols Make People Reflect Themselves
The images on tarot cards are ambiguous and polysemous.
They contain universal human experiences,
yet are designed to be read differently by each person.When people encounter ambiguous stimuli,
they automatically project their own experiences and emotions.This structure is nearly identical to the psychological Rorschach test.
Tarot is less about reading the cards
and more about people reading themselves.
Therefore, Tarot Is Not Prophecy but a “Self-Interpretation Device”
Tarot cannot be reproduced, verified, or statistically accumulated.
It satisfies almost none of the conditions of science.Yet people still feel that it “was accurate”
because of confirmation bias, selective memory, the Barnum effect,
and the human desire to construct self-narratives.Tarot is not a tool that tells the future.
It is a device that externalizes and organizes
thoughts that were already present in the mind.
Why Do We Still Draw Tarot?
What people truly want
is not to know the future.What am I afraid of?
What am I postponing?
Before which choice am I wavering?Tarot is the fastest tool for pulling these questions to the surface.
Tarot does not speak fate.
It clarifies questions.And when questions become clear,
a person finally begins to choose.
If you enjoyed this piece:
Explore the “Manual for Destiny” collection
Discover more from the Abstract collection -
Jesus’ Salvation Was Not an “Afterlife Ticket”
We Were Taught to Think of Salvation as a Post-Death Issue
In Christianity, salvation is usually understood like this:
If you believe, you go to heaven.
If you do not believe, you are judged.Salvation is consumed as a posthumous result—
a verdict delivered after life ends.But this is different in tone and substance
from the salvation Jesus spoke of.
The Salvation Jesus Spoke of Begins “Here and Now”
In Jesus’ language,
the Kingdom of Heaven is not a future place,
but a transformation of life that begins in the present moment.“The Kingdom of God is among you.”
This does not mean a place you go after death—
it means an event in which a person changes, here and now.Salvation is not an afterlife ticket.
It is a conversion of one’s way of living.
Salvation Is an Event of Being Released from Self-Centeredness
The core of the salvation Jesus spoke of
was not about suppressing desire.It was about being released from:
self-centeredness,
self-preservation instinct,
and the attitude of judging the world by one’s own standards.That is why he said:
Love not only your friends, but your enemies.
Choose forgiveness over revenge.This was not a moral code—
it was a demand for a transformation of consciousness.
That Is Why This Salvation Was Dangerous
Such salvation cannot be managed by power.
When people change here and now,
hierarchies, control, and order are shaken.So the Church translated this salvation
into a posthumous judgment system.“You do not need to change now.
If you believe correctly,
you will be rewarded after death.”Salvation was pushed into the afterlife.
This Salvation Resembles Other Traditions
This structure overlaps with:
Confucian following-the-heart-without-transgression,
Buddhist liberation,
Laozi’s wu wei,
Stoic apatheia.All refer not to the disappearance of desire,
but to a redirection of desire.This is not a difference of religions,
but a shared observation about human consciousness.
Therefore, Jesus’ Salvation Is a Present Issue
Jesus’ salvation was not a future reward—
it was a present transformation.An event in which a person changes
here and now.That is why it was dangerous.
That is why it was pushed into the afterlife.And that is why
it must be read again today.
If you enjoyed this piece:
Explore the “Character Creation Complete” collection
Discover more from the Abstract collection -
Why Has Art Become So Difficult?
Why Do We Shrink Before Art?
Many people say:
“Art is difficult.”
“I don’t really get it—I lack cultural literacy.”But has art really become difficult?
Or has the language surrounding art become difficult?Before we even look at a work,
we are already given explanations.This belongs to a certain movement.
This work is important in a certain context.
This artist holds a certain position.And in that moment,
we stop being people who feel—
and become people who check for the correct answer.
What Gombrich Disliked
In the preface to The Story of Art, Gombrich says:
Those who overuse “academic terminology”
not to awaken their readers
but to display themselves—
might they not be the ones who “look down on us from the clouds”?What he criticized was not scholarship itself.
What he questioned was the moment
when academic language blocks the entrance to art.When technical terms come first,
the senses are pushed back.Art is not something to be understood first—
it is something to be encountered first.
But its entrance becomes sealed by explanation.
Art Was Originally Something That Reaches Us Before Interpretation
This is how art originally worked:
Sensation → Meaning → Thought
But now we are taught this way:
Meaning → Sensation → Conformity
We are told the correct answer first,
then taught how to feel.In this structure,
art loses its function.
Interpretation Is Not the Ability to “Explain Well”
Interpreting art
is not a test of getting the right answer.Interpretation is:
re-speaking in your own sensory language
why this scene reached you the way it did.It doesn’t matter if your words are clumsy.
It doesn’t matter if you lack academic terminology.Art does not belong to those who explain well—
it belongs to those who felt first.
So Art Must Become Easy Again
We did not make art difficult—
we piled too much “correct-answer language” on top of it.Gombrich saw this structure.
That may be why he deliberately called his book
one written for teenagers.Because for those whose senses are not yet hardened,
those who are seeing the world for the first time,
art can live and move again.Art is not cultural literacy.
It is a sensory event that reopens thought.And that event
can already begin inside you—
even without any explanation.
If you enjoyed this piece:
Explore the “A Museum Open 24/7” collection
Discover more from the Abstract collection