"If truth changes depending on the situation, how can it ever be called absolute?"
This is indeed a piercing and painful critique. From the perspective of theology, a "compromise" that alters doctrine in the face of scientific facts is not a sweet survival strategy; it is a lethal poison. Divinity, by definition, must be absolute and flawless to hold any value. The moment theology steps back under the weight of new scientific evidence, sighing, "Oh, really? Then we’ll tweak our doctrine a bit," that divinity degrades into a sloppy, human-edited text.
To retreat is to concede that all past declarations, once vociferously proclaimed as absolute truths, could actually have been wrong. Compromise becomes synonymous with a declaration of surrender, an admission of its own powerlessness. Did modern theology truly choose to compromise, begging for survival at the feet of science? Confronted with this paradoxical question, sophisticated theologians did not pull out the card of compromise. Instead, they reached for "the purification of interpretation."
God’s Word Is Not Wrong; Humanity Merely Misunderstood It
Theologians argue that they have not compromised doctrine in light of scientific discoveries; rather, thanks to science, they have finally realized that humanity had been misunderstanding the will of God.
For instance, the Bible contains passages stating that "the earth shall not be moved." Ancients took this literally, using it as the bedrock for the geocentric model. However, when Galileo and later scientists definitively proved heliocentrism, theology did not rewrite the sentences; it purified its interpretation. They reasoned: "Ah, it did not mean God literally stopped the earth’s physical rotation. It was a literary expression showing that the domain of life God granted humanity is spiritually secure!"
The logic dictates that the divinity (the text) was perfect from the beginning, but the ignorance of finite humans (the interpretation) receiving it was flawed. In this light, science is not an enemy that tears down divinity. It is a mirror that sweeps away the superstitions and fixed ideas blinding humanity, allowing us to view true divinity with greater transparency.
The Secret of God’s ‘Tailored Education’
Theology possesses a time-honored concept known as "Divine Accommodation." This theory posits that when the omniscient, omnipotent God revealed Himself to humans trapped in the limitations of time and space, He provided a "tailored education" fitted to the intellectual capacity of that specific era.
Had God explained the creation of the world to ancient Hebrews 3,000 years ago using quantum mechanics or the Big Bang theory, absolutely no one would have understood it. God had no choice but to explain it through the grand metaphors and poetic language of His time: "creating light, water, and land over six days."
Therefore, science advancing to uncover the actual mechanisms of the universe is not a compromise with divinity. It is much closer to a confession that humanity has finally grown up, whispering: "We are finally mature enough to understand the actual principles of the world that our Father taught us through metaphors when we were children."
The Last Stand Born from the Fear of Compromise
Naturally, within this precarious tightrope walk, many felt a visceral terror that moving back even an inch would trigger a domino effect, collapsing all divinity. The extreme manifestation of that fear is modern "Fundamentalism" and "Creation Science."
To protect divinity, they made a desperate last stand, flatly denying every human achievement of modern science—from the fact that the Earth is 4.6 billion years old to the reality of biological evolution. For them, it was a tragic, do-or-die battle; they believed that to compromise was to admit they could no longer be recognized. Ironically, however, attempting to defend divinity by rejecting undeniable facts did not safeguard religion. Instead, it became an "own goal" that isolated religion as a stagnant superstition in modern society.
Changing the Wrapping Paper to Protect the Essence
Ultimately, the path theology chose to survive the age of reason was not a compromise of its "essence (divinity)," but a bold replacement of its "wrapping paper (the worldview of the era)."
The strategy cleanly surrenders the wrapping paper—the physical mechanics of the cosmos and historical facts—to the realm of science, while remaining absolutely uncompromising regarding the core of spiritual meaning: why this universe exists and what values humans must uphold.
If theology had stubbornly insisted until the bitter end that its outdated shell was absolute truth despite scientific facts, it would not have been defending divinity; it would have merely been throwing a tantrum. Shedding old garments to put on the language of the current era is not a compromise. It is theology’s most fierce transformation to protect the truth.
Leave a Reply