From Conflict to Mutual Reference: The End of Physical Clash
The traditional “war of all against all” was a clash of survival instincts driven to secure limited resources. However, if everyone awakens to maximize their own inner freedom, the object of struggle shifts from external resources to the “expansion of one’s own narrative.” The fact that each individual becomes a one-person platform implies that the desire to have one’s uniqueness recognized and interacted with by others takes precedence over the desire to dominate them. At this juncture, the other is no longer an enemy to be conquered, but an object of subscription—”data from a different perspective” that will enrich one’s own world.
The Shared Division of Sovereignty and the Multi-Layered Network
A centralized power cannot exist within this system. This is because each individual is a one-person nation and platform, legislating and executing their own life. Power is redefined not as “domination,” but as “influence” and “inspiration.” If I resonate with another’s principles, I simply subscribe to (follow) them; if their narrative infringes upon my freedom or loses my interest, I merely unsubscribe from (unfollow) them. This represents the pinnacle of voluntary solidarity, where order is maintained purely through “charm” and “authenticity” in a state stripped of physical coercion.
The Sharing of Scripts and Creative Evolution
In a society where everyone is awakened, “scripts” are never enforced; they are exhibited. Individuals turned into one-person platforms convert the worldviews and lifestyles they have built into content to share with the world. By mutually subscribing to one another, people draw inspiration from each other’s scripts, integrating or altering them to fit their own narratives. In this process, social evolution is explosively accelerated—not by anyone’s command, but through the mutual reference and fusion among countless one-person platforms.
An Alliance of Solitary Subjects: The Ethics of Distance
Paradoxically, this society will be deeply detached, yet extraordinarily peaceful. Because each individual seeks to maximize their own freedom, they are acutely aware that infringing upon the freedom of others will ultimately isolate their own platform. The ruling ethic of distance—”As long as it does not harm me, I respect your freedom”—takes hold, leaving no room for collective madness or uniform ideologies. Each exists as a solitary being, yet together they form a flexible archipelago, connecting and dispersing whenever necessary.
Conclusion: The End of the System and the Golden Age of Narrative
The “system of mutual subscription” you speak of may well be the most elegant form of anarchism humanity can achieve. It is a “spontaneous order” that manifests only when those who refuse to be ruled simultaneously choose to forfeit ruling over others.
The Intellectual Property of Min Jinseong
From chronological traces to algorithmic artifacts.
Chronological Bundle: Weekly ($20) / Monthly ($60)
Leave a Reply