-
Is Transformation Destruction?
Is the Command “Do Not Destroy” Even Possible?
Environmental discourse often says this:
We must not destroy nature.
But this statement is an impossible command from the very beginning.Breathing, eating, walking, living itself are already acts of transforming the environment.
To be alive is to rearrange the state of nature.
There is no completely non-destructive being within an ecosystem.From the moment we are born, we are already “transforming beings.”
“Destruction” Is a Moralized Technical Term
The word “destruction” originally referred to neutral transformation—
the movement of one state into another.
But within environmental discourse, the word became a moral term.Changes made by nature are called cycles.
Changes made by humans are called destruction.Yet nature erupts volcanoes, ignites wildfires, and causes mass extinctions.
Natural change is also transformation.
The moment morality intervenes, transformation becomes “sin.”
Development Is Rearrangement, Not Erasure
Development is not an act of eliminating nature.
It is the relocation of nature’s state space into another domain.Forests become cities.
Rivers become canals.
Soil becomes concrete.This is not erasure—it is rearrangement.
The problem is not transformation itself,
but which cycles that transformation breaks.
The True Nature of Environmental Crisis Is “Circuit Severance”
Environmental crises did not arise because we touched nature,
but because civilization’s transformations severed nature’s circulation circuits.Water flows were blocked.
Soil microbial circuits were cut.
Energy circulation loops were broken.The essence of environmental problems is not
“how little we touched,”
but “which circuits were severed.”
There Is No Non-Destruction, But There Is Circuit-Preserving Transformation
A completely non-destructive civilization is impossible.
But a civilization that preserves circulation circuits is possible.Agriculture that does not sever soil life circuits.
Cities that do not block water flows.
Energy systems that do not damage natural circulation structures.This is not “non-destruction.”
It is circuit-preserving transformation.
The Environment Is Not Nature’s Problem
The environmental crisis is not nature’s problem.
It is an operational problem of civilization.The question we must ask is not
“How little do we consume?”
but
“How do we design without severing circuits?”The environment is not an object to be protected—
it is a structure that must be redesigned.And that structure must be solved
not with anxiety,
but with design.
If you enjoyed this piece:
Explore the “Loading map…” collection
Discover more from the Abstract collection -
Just
The Sound of Rain
I don’t know why.
Back in high school, I rather liked rainy days.
I liked standing by the hallway window, simply watching the rain fall outside.
I liked the soft, steady sound of drizzle.
That repetitive rhythm had a way of calming my mind.
It made me feel safe.
Even the noisy sounds around me seemed to lower their voices in the presence of rain.
Wrapped in the sound of rainfall, I felt as though I had stepped into a private space of my own.Amid the bustle of a school day, the quiet brought by rain felt as if the world itself was holding its breath—
as if it were gently granting me a moment of rest.
The rain became a kind of curtain, offering me comfort,
pushing away voices, footsteps, and even anxious thoughts about the future.The noises of reality are sharp and rude; they keep poking at me.
Yet the sound of rain, though clearly a noise, quiets even my thoughts and stills my trembling heart.
It feels as if it is telling me that it’s okay to do nothing.
Perhaps it is because its very nature is different.
Human voices constantly pull at me, demanding interpretation.
Rain simply exists.
It is a noise that asks for nothing.
Rain falls simply because it falls.
Naturally.
Just because.
Just
Perhaps the things that happened to me were also like the sound of rain.
Sleeping only two or three hours a day while studying sixteen to eighteen hours,
ending up in the emergency room three times—
and still failing the college entrance exam.Loving someone as if I would give them everything,
only to be discarded as they weighed my “conditions” and walked away.Grinding and clenching my teeth because I could not bear the weight of responsibility and achievement,
eventually giving everything up, returning home, and becoming someone trapped inside.Perhaps all of these were simply like rain.
They just fell.
There was no reason.
They were simply that way.Maybe none of these were causes, but scenery—
passing rain clouds that didn’t need to be interpreted, just passing by.
It would have been nice if I could have blocked them with an umbrella,
but I can also get wet for a while and dry again.Even after pouring down like a storm,
the sky returns with a clear, innocent face, as if nothing had happened.
Not clinging to it, not forcing myself to forget—
just looking up and saying, “It’s raining,”
might be what true healing really is.Of course, I will probably keep asking why it rained.
But I hope that one day,
I will ask not in resentment, soaked to the bone—
but simply,
just because I am curious.
The Smell of Soil
Before and during rain, the smell of soil always rises.
There is a substance called geosmin, produced by a microorganism in the soil known as actinobacteria.
Geosmin is the main component of the smell of earth, and humans are remarkably sensitive to it.Just before it rains, humidity in the air rises rapidly.
This allows geosmin particles near the ground to diffuse into the air or cling to soil particles and spread.
As atmospheric pressure drops and winds shift,
these scent particles are carried closer to our noses.Before the sound of rain reaches us,
the smell of soil always arrives first.
That scent becomes a powerful trigger for memory—
the moment you smell it, memories from those days return.The naturally rising scent of earth before rain,
the feeling that people’s colorful umbrellas looked cute,
memories of staying at a friend’s place during Chuseok to study instead of going home,
walking to the school library under such heavy rain that it felt like visiting a valley,
running around the soccer field during PE class despite not being able to see even an inch ahead—Perhaps it is enough to find meaning
simply within those moments,
just those kinds of ordinary things.
The Umbrella
I just need one friend to share an umbrella with on the way home.
I simply want to live helping people so that no one gets hurt or has their daily life collapse because of the rain.
That is all I wish to do.If possible, I hope the friend who walks under the same umbrella with me is someone full of love—
someone who rejoices in what I do,
perhaps even more passionately than I do.And in the midst of all that,
I hope we sometimes fold our umbrellas and run into the rain,
with clumsiness and playfulness.I hope to experience
gentle irregularities
within an otherwise predictable everyday life.
-
Does Mind Come First, or Does Matter Come First?
This Question Is Being Asked in an Outdated Way
“Does mind create matter,
or does matter create mind?”We accept this question almost automatically.
Materialism says: matter comes first, and mind is its byproduct.
Idealism says the opposite: mind comes first, and matter is its result.But both positions already share the same premise —
that mind and matter are two separate substances.And for Whitehead, that premise itself is the wrong starting point.
The World Is Made Not of “Matter,” but of “Events”
For Whitehead, the smallest unit of reality is neither matter nor mind.
His world is made of events.More precisely, the world is a chain of countless “happenings.”
And from the very moment an event is born, it has two faces at once:
A physical aspect that receives the prior world,
and a mental aspect that decides how to interpret it and what it will become.Mind is not an ornament added on top of matter.
Matter is not a product separately produced by mind.
They are born together from the beginning.
The Real Meaning of “Mind Comes First”
When Whitehead says “the mental aspect comes first,”
he is not referring to human consciousness or thought.The “mind” he means is
the capacity to decide how an event will constitute itself.Every event first determines what form it will crystallize into,
and that determination is realized as material fact.Decision comes first;
matter is the trace left by that decision as it solidifies.
What Materialism Misses
Materialism explains the world as meaningless matter.
Meaning, value, and mind are treated as later byproducts.But for Whitehead, the world is from the beginning already operating
with embedded structures of decision and meaning.If from the smallest unit of reality there already exists
a structure that selects “what it will become,”
then mind is not an add-on —
it is the world’s fundamental operating mechanism.
This Is Neither Idealism nor Materialism
In Whitehead’s world,
mind does not create matter,
and matter does not create mind.His universe moves by the structure:
decisions create the world.Every being is a micro-decision-maker,
and at the same time the crystallized result of its decisions.This is neither idealism nor materialism,
but a cosmology in which decision is the basic unit of reality.
Why We Must Ask This Question Again
In a world where mind is reduced to a byproduct,
meaning, responsibility, and value can be erased at any time.But if from the smallest unit of reality
decision and meaning are already embedded,
then the reality we live in is not a random accident of matter.Does mind come first, or does matter come first?
This question must now change.Whitehead’s answer is this:
Decision comes first.
And that decision is still making the world —
even at this very moment.
If you enjoyed this piece:
Explore the “The Place God Left” collection
Discover more from the Abstract collection